Now Congress Is Going After File Sharing Networks For Porn

from the hmm.--sense-a-pattern? dept

It appears that Democratic Senators have decided that their “moral issue” this week is online porn. How else can you describe three separate stories involving Democratic Senators and porn — and each one seems equally pointless. There was, of course, the Hilary Clinton against consensual sex in a video game that is just fine when it only promoted murder, carjacking, prostitution and general mayhem. Then there are the Senators pushing for an online porn tax against websites that offer porn. And, now, in the wake of the Grokster decision, some Senators held a hearing to discuss what the various file sharing networks were doing, and Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer seemed quite upset that these file sharing apps didn’t filter out porn. Of course, this isn’t a Democratic/Republican issue. Republicans, such as Senator Orrin Hatch, freaked out about the same thing a few years ago. And, this particular panel also featured Republican Senator Ted Stevens, who was just as angry at file sharing companies. At this point, it seems like just about any party, regardless of political affiliation has no qualms about making grandstanding announcements about technology they don’t understand to make it look like they’re solving some sort of problem. It just so happens that, right now, everyone feels they need to stand strong on “moral” issues. Unfortunately, their morals need a lesson in how technology works. Senator Boxer and Senator Stevens came down hard on porn over file sharing networks, with Boxer saying that “it’s not going to sit well” if they say it can’t be filtered, and, Stevens saying: “People tell me we can’t do anything about it. I don’t believe that.” What this has to do, specifically, with file sharing is anyone’s guess. A study by the Government Accounting Office (which you would think the Senators would know about) concluded a while ago that porn on file sharing networks is no worse than porn over the regular internet, but you don’t see these Senators screaming that ISPs need to filter out all porn on a regular internet connection. Instead, they pick on file sharing apps, because they’re easy targets and allow the Senators to look tough on online porn while not actually doing anything about online porn. The Senators made the ridiculous suggestion that because entertainment industry services don’t have porn, obviously file sharing apps can filter it — suggesting they don’t realize the two systems (file sharing and download stores) serve two very different purposes and work in two very different ways. If the issue is dealing with children accessing online pornography — that’s fine. However, unfairly targeting one particular app is pointless.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Now Congress Is Going After File Sharing Networks For Porn”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
7 Comments
Anon says:

Stevens

Stevens saying: “People tell me we can’t do anything about it. I don’t believe that.”

Was Stevens referring to CAN-SPAM or P2P? Does it matter? 😉

Here’s a quick lesson in the Internet, distinguished congress(wo)men. Telling the ENTIRE Internet what you will do about its activity, um, uh… bad move. First of all, it’s a global community, and people outside the US don’t care what you think about porn. Second, people outside the US don’t care what you think about anything. Third, most of those in the US agree with them.

You come across like trolls, and unlike how you bully witnesses around, your views are farts in the wind online. Your bills are about the same. You could revoke the entire Constitution, and it wouldn’t mean a damn thing to a Russian hosted torrent tracker.

Get a clue, and learn about how to even speak to the medium even before trying to legislate it. Barking orders will only generate backlash… severe backlash.

cuebei says:

porn: for the people, by the people

what these senators don’t understand is the people are the ones who want it, otherwise it wouldn’t be on file sharing services. Isn’t this country suppost to be a country for the people, by the people. If the people want porn (which they obviously do), then why would a any politition try to take that away?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...