Help To Save The World: Go Online
from the easy-when-you-know-how dept
Too often we read that the Internet is making us stupid or fat, or destroying the “fabric of society.” Indeed, judging by the all the digital jeremiads it’s a wonder that anybody dares to use it at all, since it’s clearly irredeemably bad in every way. So it’s refreshing to come across an upbeat piece from Lauren Weinstein with the inspiring title “How the Internet Can Save the World.” His basic point is this:
When people have the easy and inexpensive means to communicate directly, especially in informal settings and about the everyday aspects of life, they usually discover that they have much more in common than they perhaps expected. This seems true whether we’re using written communications, or audio and video links like Skype or Google+ Hangouts — working our way ever closer toward a full “virtual presence” that makes our common humanity impossible to ignore.
In other words, far from always isolating us, or bringing out the worst, the Internet also has the power to unite us and bring out the best. That’s another reason why we need to worry when governments or interest groups try to control the Internet, and dictate what we can and cannot say and do on it: it’s not just an assault on our freedoms, it’s also an obstacle to greater understanding between people and nations.
Weinstein concludes:
I spend much of my time considering the ways in which the wonders of the Internet could be wrecked, or blocked, or subverted. But it’s also important that we consider the vast potential the Net holds for improving the world in the most relevant and important of ways.
Not just in terms of science and research, though those are great. Not just in regard to commerce and the global economy, though these are crucial.
But also in terms of the basic fact of fundamental human communications, of being able to as freely and openly as possible discuss with other mere mortals around the planet the nature of our lives, hopes and dreams, our loves, and yes, our fears as well.
It’s a post that makes you glad you use the Internet, not guilty, as the pundits of pessimism would have us feel. Read the whole thing — and then to go back to what you were doing before: helping to save the world by communicating with others online.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Filed Under: internet, lauren weinstein
Comments on “Help To Save The World: Go Online”
Awwwww, so cute
Re: I smell conspiracy
Did Greenpeace pay you to post that : )
Not so sure...
‘they usually discover that they have much more in common than they perhaps expected.’
It seems Ms Weinstein has never visited the places where someone mentions:
a. Any particular gaming console
b. Any particular subset of PCs (Windows/Mac)
c. Football should be called soccer
d. Any particular religion or lack of it
e. Praise/critique of copyright/patent laws
3,2,1… Start Flame war!
Re: 1,2,3,4.....you just started a flame war
correction..
*c. Soccer should be called Football
Re: Re: 1,2,3,4.....you just started a flame war
Soccer is called Football. Just because you colonials don’t, doesn’t mean it isn’t.
Re: Re: Re: 1,2,3,4.....you just started a flame war
Football is played with the feet a ball.
Handegg is played with the hands and an egg.
Re: Re: Re: 1,2,3,4.....you just started a flame war
Football is played with the feet and a ball.
Handegg is played with the hands and an egg.
Re: Not so sure...
OK, outside of (c) you have a valid point.
But. still, outside of trolls and paid “agents” (and I hope they don’t pay bob much..what the hell..blow the bank on him!) there’ no reason that a discussion can’t take place on almost all that list once people get by their biases.
In fact we’ve seen it in this forum where, outside of the trollish types and self appointed MPAA/RIAA defenders people have changed their views. We’re not in a pub where largish amounts of beer cement arguments in place, often just for the fun of it.
Where we aren’t exposed to constant propaganda about the “enemy” types whoever they may be we have this wonderful tendency to get along. It also means the “enemy”, whoever they are, are easier to spot.
They’re the ones that want to divide us.
CENSORED
“When people have the easy and inexpensive means to communicate directly, especially in informal settings and about the everyday aspects of life, they usually discover that they have much more in common than they perhaps expected.”
Governments do not like this. When people communicate and share ideas, it weakens the control of mass media and government. The public begins to question policies that we are told are for our benefit but contrast with reality. Politicians can corporations can no longer just state things without evidence to back up their statements, because netizens will simply seek out the facts and share them At best this makes the corporations/governments look incompetent and at worst appears to be flat out lying to the public.
Therefore the internet must be controlled. Unfortunately, the powers that be seem to think of the internet as a phone or television and the controls that work on those mediums just don’t seem to have much effect on the interwebs.
Re: CENSORED
“Unfortunately, the powers that be seem to think of the internet as a phone or television and the controls that work on those mediums just don’t seem to have much effect on the interwebs.”
I would have gone with “fortunately”.
If these clueless morons ever do figure out how the interwebs work, then we may have a real challenge on or hands.
Re: Re: CENSORED
Yeah, but what are the odds of that happening?
I think most of us would agree...
I think most of us would agree that the internet is a wonderful way to share information. One of the best ideas I’ve seen online is the Charter for Compassion – http://charterforcompassion.org/ . It could, potentially, help “Save The World”. Pretty much everyone could get behind it, and channel energy into it, instead of wasting energy fighting over controversial issues and accomplishing little (except creating more sorrow and strife).
Re: I think most of us would agree...
I think I’ve been spammed.
Re: Re: I think most of us would agree...
Apologies if it seemed/sounded like spam. Not selling anything. Just want to help make the world a better place.
The reasons why we love the net are the same reasons why they hate it, and vice versa.
1,2,3,4.....I inflamed a flame war
Either way… Football or HandEgg is better played on Linux than on Windoze or AppleCrap.
Glyn Moody writes:
Classic contradiction.
Re: Re:
Mr. Lauren Weinstein is a well-known writer and social advocate. It’s a darned shame that some folks commenting here don’t know his work and instead seem to poke fun at his name. *sigh*
Re: Re: Re:
James Carlson writes:
Classic contradiction.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Hey, you’re that kooky guy from the OS/2 newsgroups, aren’t you?
Re: Re: Re:
I have to agree with tholen here. Google hath spoken:
https://www.google.com/search?q=lauren&tbm=isch
“Lauren” is quite definitely a girl’s name.
Re:
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with techdirt, Coward?
Re:
Quingle Gas writes:
What does your URL have to do with techdirt, Gas?
What does your classic pontification have to do with techdirt, Gas?