Celebrate The 20th Anniversary Of A Seminal Section 230 Case Upholding It With This Series Of Essays
from the Internet-enabling-cases dept
We have been talking a lot lately about how important Section 230 is for enabling innovation and fostering online speech, and, especially as Congress now flirts with erasing its benefits, how fortuitous it was that Congress ever put it on the books in the first place.
But passing the law was only the first step: for it to have meaningful benefit, courts needed to interpret it in a way that allowed for it to have its protective effect on Internet platforms. Zeran v. America Online was one of the first cases to test the bounds of Section 230’s protection, and the first to find that protection robust. Had the court decided otherwise, we likely would not have seen the benefits the statute has since then afforded.
This Sunday the decision in Zeran turns 20 years old, and to mark the occasion Eric Goldman and Jeff Kosseff have gathered together more than 20 essays from Internet lawyers and scholars reflecting on the case, the statute, and all of its effects. I have an essay there, “The First Hard Case: ?Zeran v. AOL? and What It Can Teach Us About Today?s Hard Cases,” as do many other advocates, including lawyers involved with the original case. Even people who are not fans of Section 230 and its legacy are represented. All of these pieces are worth reading and considering, especially by anyone interested in setting policy around these issues.
Filed Under: cda 230, intermediary liability, zeran
Companies: aol
Comments on “Celebrate The 20th Anniversary Of A Seminal Section 230 Case Upholding It With This Series Of Essays”
A celebration of Section 230? MyNameHere’s really not going to like this.
Intermediaries: Better than gatekeepers, and let’s keep it that way at the least.