California Attorney General Uses Twitter To Threaten United Airlines With Possible Legal Action

from the pointless-privacy-policies dept

Can we just admit that laws requiring privacy policies are a dumb idea? They make almost no sense. No one reads them. And the laws requiring them don’t require that you actually keep info private… just that you have one of those privacy policies that no one reads and no one cares about. The only ways you get in trouble are (a) if you don’t have a privacy policy or (b) if you don’t abide by your privacy policy. Thus, the basic incentive is to write a privacy policy that is opaque and which no one will read — and which says “you have no privacy at all, we can do whatever we want with your data” so you could never violate it.

But grandstanding politicians see this as an easy and cheap way to be seen as “protecting the little guy” even though it does nothing along those lines. It appears that California Attorney General Kamala Harris may be jumping into the fray — and bizarrely using Twitter to passive aggressively threaten United Airlines. In a tweet, she asks the company where its privacy policy is on its mobile app:

That link is to California’s law that requires privacy policies. But, once again, we’re at a loss to see what this does for actual privacy, if anything. If the app doesn’t have a privacy policy, does that change how United Airlines uses people’s data? Doubtful. Is anyone who uses the app actually reading the privacy policy? Doubtful. If they do, will they understand it? Unlikely. So, what does this kind of thing do? You’d think that there were, perhaps, more pressing things for the state to focus on rather than harassing companies on Twitter.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: twitter, united airlines

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “California Attorney General Uses Twitter To Threaten United Airlines With Possible Legal Action”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

” If the app doesn’t have a privacy policy, does that change how United Airlines uses people’s data? Doubtful”

I question that. If a company is forced to come up with a public privacy policy, they will be more likely to follow those rules internally, and they are less likely to put something public that says “we’ll do whatever we please.”

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re:

Except that the vast majority of privacy policies that I’ve seen simply say “we’ll do whatever we please,” except in thick legalistic jargon.

Privacy policies really are worthless. Companies who care about treating their customers right will do so with or without such a policy. Companies who don’t will just write the policy to let them do whatever they want anyway.

The idea was that at least people could know what the site will be doing — but as with contract, click-through agreements, and etc., all you have to do is make it long and impenetrable enough and the few people who bother reading it won’t understand it anyway.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Your experience differs from mine, I guess.

You seem to assume that everyone within a “company” feels the same way about things. I don’t think that’s true, especially within a large company like United Airlines.

But if the policy-makers have to confront an issue and create a formal policy, I think you’re a lot more likely to get compliance with that policy from the middle management and others that might otherwise do whatever they feel like individually.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

You seem to assume that everyone within a “company” feels the same way about things

I assume no such thing. I’m not sure why you think that I do.

But if the policy-makers have to confront an issue and create a formal policy, I think you’re a lot more likely to get compliance

I agree. My point is simply that most privacy policies specify that you have little, if any, privacy, so “compliance” is meaningless.

Anonymous Coward says:

These agreements and policies are just a bunch of legal mumbo jumbo voodoo and I have never read an entire document.
So you put it up on the web with a Checkbox waiting to say ‘I read that’ but you have no real proof. How about making them shorter and making me prove I read it. How about a short quiz at the end of it? Yea right!!
I want a universal ID system for the web. Then I won’t have have to agree any more. I am logged in and if I use your stuff I agree.
One log in for each person. I am so sick of logging in, that I want to stay permanently logged out.
I don’t want to log in with Facebook (takes longer) or register for an account. I simply want to pick my web name from the cloud and if no one else is using it I get it. I can then maintain my log in account on my own. I would gladly pay for this annually, do you hear me entrepreneurs? Then all I would have to do is start my computing device and log in once. No expiration, no you waited too long.
Because of the log in nightmare I as a developer have to maintain a text file that is currently 350 lines of user names and passwords. I have to keep it encrypted and make daily backups of it because if I lost it or got it stolen I could never recover it, never.
Let’s use some intelligence in the software development please. It’s very simple to see if I have rebooted or changed users on my computer. If so then ask me for the ONE password for my ONE log in.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...