Brazilian Government Mobilizes Federal Police To Handle 'Fake News' Problem

from the as-the-US-president-admires-from-afar... dept

Hot-button topic “fake news” is going to be the downfall of the internet. All over the world, governments are trying to tackle the non-issue by introducing harmful legislation that will only result in increased direct control of the press by the governments passing these bills. “Fake news” defies definition. It could be read to encompass satire and parody. It could also cover legitimate news that deals with subject matter certain people don’t like. That’s pretty much how it’s been defined by the party in power here: whatever Donald Trump doesn’t like is deemed “fake news” by the Commander in Chief, even if the news is based on factual events and credible statements.

Allowing the government to get in the speech business is a bad idea. All “solutions” proposed by world government officials are vehicles for abuse by the state — a way to suppress anything that doesn’t align with the party in power’s narrative. On a smaller scale, it also creates a handy heckler’s veto for social media platforms, putting brigades a click away from shouting down stuff they don’t like.

In Brazil, fake news is under attack… and in the worst way possible. Governments nudging media platforms and press agencies towards self-censorship is one thing. Handing this over to men with guns is another.

Yesterday afternoon, official Twitter account of Brazil’s Federal Police (its FBI equivalent) posted an extraordinary announcement. The bureaucratically nonchalant tone it used belied its significance. The tweet, at its core, purports to vest in the federal police and the federal government that oversees it the power to regulate, control, and outright censor political content on the internet that is assessed to be “false,” and to “punish” those who disseminate it. The new power would cover both social media posts and entire websites devoted to politics.

“In the next few days, the Federal Police will begin activities in Brasília [the nation’s capital] by a specially formed group to combat false news during the [upcoming 2018 presidential] election process,” the official police tweet stated. It added: “The measures are intended to identify and punish the authors of ‘fake news’ for or against candidates.” Top police officials told media outlets that their working group would include representatives of the judiciary’s election branch and leading prosecutors, though one of the key judicial figures involved is the highly controversial right-wing Supreme Court judge, Gilmar Mendes, who has long blurred judicial authority with his political activism.

Considering the breadth and depth of the government’s corruption, this initiative has the chance to deliver instant death sentences to journalists, bloggers, and social media shitposters all over the nation. This isn’t hyperbole. Violators will be arrested. And any arrest can result in dead suspects, especially when the Brazil Federal Police’s itchy trigger fingers are propelled by a sense of “duty” that has promised to ignore a lack of legal authority to engage in purging of publications the government doesn’t like.

Tellingly, these police officials vow that they will proceed to implement the censorship program even if no new law is enacted. They insist that no new laws are necessary by pointing to a pre-internet censorship law enacted in 1983 — during the time Brazil was ruled by a brutal military dictatorship that severely limited free expression and routinely imprisoned dissidents.

A top police official just yesterday warned that, absent a new law, they will invoke the authorities of one of the dictatorship era’s most repressive laws: the so-called Law of National Security, which contain deliberately vague passages making it a felony to “spread rumors that caused panic.”

This police official also took time to complain the penalties for violating the old law the cops will use if the new law doesn’t pass were too lenient and didn’t provide for enough punishment for citizens uttering unpopular opinions or statements. The law cited by the Federal Police was — and is — a dictator’s best friend, allowing the government to control narratives and stifle dissent while claiming every bit of abuse is justified due to omnipresent national security concerns.

Nations that might be concerned with a corrupt government’s crackdown on “fake news” are in no place to complain. Many governments that consider themselves far more tolerant of speech have introduced or passed laws targeting fake news in recent months, leveling the high ground they might have used to denounce the deployment of the federal police force to punish speech the Brazilian government doesn’t like. France, Germany, etc. are Brazil’s bedfellows. The lack of jackbooted thugs kicking down bloggers’ doors doesn’t do much to brighten the “free world’s” tarnished halo.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Brazilian Government Mobilizes Federal Police To Handle 'Fake News' Problem”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
12 Comments
Andy says:

Fake News

The definition of fake is false or not true, i woudl think any neutral investigatory team could easily rule over whether a story/article on the internet is fake news and block it.

Not doing anything to resolve this is only going to give governments the power to spread lies to gain votes using the media and that must be prevented at all costs, just look at how the republicans have used fake news for so long and with the help of the Russian government taken the american presidency….

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Fake News

The definition of fake is false or not true

It can also mean "fraudulent". Is your comment, which omits this sense of the word, therefore "fake news"? I wouldn’t call a comment "news", but you didn’t define that term either.

Should intent matter? The Onion is "fake news" under your definition, while others might view it as satire.

Ninja (profile) says:

Amusing. So how are they going to tackle the problem in Whatsapp (Brazil is one of the countries with broadest adoption of the tool in the world)? Because it is where the bulk of the fake news is spreading. And it’s encrypted and out of reach.

Considering we are walking fast towards a totalitarian state you can place this decision firmly into the authoritarian/censorship field.

DannyB (profile) says:

Mr. Trump please pay attention!

Considering the breadth and depth of the government’s corruption, this initiative has the chance to deliver instant death sentences to journalists, bloggers, and social media shitposters all over the nation. This isn’t hyperbole. Violators will be arrested. And any arrest can result in dead suspects, especially when the Brazil Federal Police’s itchy trigger fingers are propelled by a sense of "duty" that has promised to ignore a lack of legal authority to engage in purging of publications the government doesn’t like.

Dear Mr. Trump,

This is a model you should pay attention to.

Remember what you said to police: don’t be too nice to them when you’re shoving them into a police car. It’s good to rough them up a bit, because they are obviously guilty. Feel free to inflict extra-judicial punishment.

Also remember, then pen is a much mightier weapon, and therefore a much bigger threat to the state, than actual weapons.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Disturbing eagerness

A top police official just yesterday warned that, absent a new law, they will invoke the authorities of one of the dictatorship era’s most repressive laws: the so-called Law of National Security, which contain deliberately vague passages making it a felony to “spread rumors that caused panic.”

That they are apparently so quick to apply one of the tools of a repressive dictator is just all sorts of disturbing, as well as revealing the kind of mindset they have, to the point that I can’t help but suspect that they would have been quite happy to have been around when that law was originally passed.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
15:42 Supreme Court Shrugs Off Opportunity To Overturn Fifth Circuit's Batshit Support Of Texas Drag Show Ban (62)
15:31 Hong Kong's Zero-Opposition Legislature Aims To Up Oppression With New 'National Security' Law (33)
09:30 5th Circuit Is Gonna 5th Circus: Declares Age Verification Perfectly Fine Under The First Amendment (95)
13:35 Missouri’s New Speech Police (67)
15:40 Florida Legislator Files Bill That Would Keep Killer Cops From Being Named And Shamed (38)
10:49 Fifth Circuit: Upon Further Review, Fuck The First Amendment (39)
13:35 City Of Los Angeles Files Another Lawsuit Against Recipient Of Cop Photos The LAPD Accidentally Released (5)
09:30 Sorry Appin, We’re Not Taking Down Our Article About Your Attempts To Silence Reporters (41)
10:47 After Inexplicably Allowing Unconstitutional Book Ban To Stay Alive For Six Months, The Fifth Circuit Finally Shuts It Down (23)
15:39 Judge Reminds Deputies They Can't Arrest Someone Just Because They Don't Like What Is Being Said (33)
13:24 Trump Has To Pay $392k For His NY Times SLAPP Suit (16)
10:43 Oklahoma Senator Thinks Journalists Need Licenses, Should Be Trained By PragerU (88)
11:05 Appeals Court: Ban On Religious Ads Is Unconstitutional Because It's Pretty Much Impossible To Define 'Religion' (35)
10:49 Colorado Journalist Says Fuck Prior Restraint, Dares Court To Keep Violating The 1st Amendment (35)
09:33 Free Speech Experts Realizing Just How Big A Free Speech Hypocrite Elon Is (55)
15:33 No Love For The Haters: Illinois Bans Book Bans (But Not Really) (38)
10:44 Because The Fifth Circuit Again Did Something Ridiculous, The Copia Institute Filed Yet Another Amicus Brief At SCOTUS (11)
12:59 Millions Of People Are Blocked By Pornhub Because Of Age Verification Laws (78)
10:59 Federal Court Says First Amendment Protects Engineers Who Offer Expert Testimony Without A License (17)
12:58 Sending Cops To Search Classrooms For Controversial Books Is Just Something We Do Now, I Guess (221)
09:31 Utah Finally Sued Over Its Obviously Unconstitutional Social Media ‘But Think Of The Kids!’ Law (47)
12:09 The EU’s Investigation Of ExTwitter Is Ridiculous & Censorial (37)
09:25 Media Matters Sues Texas AG Ken Paxton To Stop His Bogus, Censorial ‘Investigation’ (44)
09:25 Missouri AG Announces Bullshit Censorial Investigation Into Media Matters Over Its Speech (108)
09:27 Supporting Free Speech Means Supporting Victims Of SLAPP Suits, Even If You Disagree With The Speakers (74)
15:19 State Of Iowa Sued By Pretty Much Everyone After Codifying Hatred With A LGBTQ-Targeting Book Ban (157)
13:54 Retiree Arrested For Criticizing Local Officials Will Have Her Case Heard By The Supreme Court (9)
12:04 Judge Says Montana’s TikTok Ban Is Obviously Unconstitutional (4)
09:27 Congrats To Elon Musk: I Didn’t Think You Had It In You To File A Lawsuit This Stupid. But, You Crazy Bastard, You Did It! (151)
12:18 If You Kill Two People In A Car Crash, You Shouldn’t Then Sue Their Relatives For Emailing Your University About What You Did (47)
More arrow